“The Center may have taken away my platform, but not my voice,” he said. Gilberg, meanwhile, said he will continue to support the same mission that drew him to The Center in the first place. “However,” she added, “the Board believes it is time for a new leader to build on our spectacular growth and improve the workplace culture to reflect our values of strength through diversity and being a safe haven where people can thrive.” Gilberg’s many achievements during his tenure,” Ursua said, noting that from 2015 to 2019, The Center’s annual revenue doubled to $2 million and the number of full-time employees rose from 14 to 26. Still, the board acknowledged his accomplishments during his time with the nonprofit, which started in 2007 when he began as a volunteer. Gilberg’s values were not in alignment with those of The Center.” “While he was on administrative leave, and through an external independent investigation,” the organization said, “the Board found that Mr. The Center, in its statement, did not detail how the probe was conducted. “Now I know that there was never any hope for a fair investigation.” “I had hoped that a fair, thorough investigation would clear my name so that I could continue the critical work of The Center,” Gilberg said. When the investigation began, Gilberg wrote in a June 29 Facebook post that he “wholeheartedly” supported the investigation.īut he said in his Tuesday statement that his view changed because of the way the process was conducted. I offered them to the investigator, but they ignored the offer and did not interview key eyewitnesses I identified.” “I stood ready with text messages, witnesses, and photos to prove the allegations against me were categorically untrue. “I was assured a fair process, and instead I was ambushed with ludicrous accusations during the investigation and then had my rebutting evidence dismissed without consideration,” he said. He also said he tried to cooperate with the investigation. Gilberg, for his part, characterized those behind the letter as “online bullies who have falsely accused me of inappropriate conduct.” The Center confirmed it received those accounts. The letter said accounts of more than 60 incidents of “abusive behavior” were sent to The Center’s board. “We want to ensure the environment at the LGBTQ Center Long Beach is consistent with The Center’s values and mission of embodying a culturally inclusive community.”Ĭalifornia attorney general sues to stop Chino Valley’s transgender notification policy “The fundamental goal of a LGBTQ Center is to be a safe space for clients as well as staff,” board President Stella Ursua said in a statement. The interim executive director is Andrew Dorado. The Center’s board and an executive search firm will conduct a nationwide hunt for a new leader. Gilberg has been on leave since June 29 as the investigation has unfolded his contract ends next week. “I cannot express the deep pain The Center’s Board has caused me with this betrayal.” “The Center approached this situation with a singular goal in mind, and it comes as no surprise that the investigation the Board commissioned arrived at their pre-ordained conclusion,” Gilberg wrote Tuesday evening. Gilberg, in an emailed statement, said the investigation was not conducted in good faith and that evidence he provided to rebut the accusations was not taken into account. 1, following a two-month investigation into allegations of racist and sexist behavior on his part. The LGBTQ Center Long Beach will not renew the contract of Executive Director Porter Gilberg, the nonprofit announced Tuesday, Sept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |